Also the technical upgrade is available if the client paid the maintenance fee…

So the end of the world is far from now

The problem happens in this case:
IF (item.Picture is disabled) AND
(use of webservice) THEN BEGIN
-Run indexrebuild in SQL;

-after indexrebuild job, you have this code somewhere run by a webservice.
tmpitem.RESET;
tmpItem.DELETEALL(FALSE); [tmpItem is a temptable]

=> ERROR because webservice thinks that the item table has been changed (NAS and classic client don’t have problems).
END;

I know you have also implemented SQL jobs to call webservices (but it came too late to be used). So we started with JobQueues. But we are considering it. Maybe we switch to it in the future.
The problem is NOT overlapping. In some cases we want it, because doing everything serially would cost too much time.

webervice
reindex
webservice (errors out)? because of blob field on item table?

I also wrote another solution for scheduling instead of NAS to use sql jobs and then you can time sql jobs in sequence and they will not overlap.

http://mibuso.com/blogs/ara3n/2009/11/14/replacing-nas-with-sql-jobs-and-nav-web-service/

http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/archive/2009/05/07/announcing-sharepoint-server-2010-preliminary-system-requirements.aspx

/Lars

runas /netonly /user:targetdomain\user programtorun.exe

Ciao

Mark

recTheTable.RESET;
recTheTable.SETCURRENTKEY(”Field 1″,”Field 2″,…);
recTheTable.SETRANGE(”Field 1″,’Value 1′);
recTheTable.SETRANGE(”Field 2″,’Value 2′);
recTheTable.MODIFYALL(”Some Field 1”,’Some Value 1’,FALSE);
recTheTable.MODIFYALL(”Some Field 2”,’Some Value 2’,FALSE);

your customer C000013 ist the first in the sort order — lucky hit.

Torsten

As a workaround, I run the Nav Classic Client/RTC Client “As Administrator”

It works!

Right-Click the Shortcut and Select “Run as Administrator”

intRecordsInserted := 0;
timStartTime := TIME;
FOR intItemNo := 1 to 50 DO
FOR intLocationCode := 1 TO 5 DO
FOR dat := TODAY TO TODAY + 1000 DO BEGIN
intRecordsInserted += 1;
CLEAR(recItemLedgerEntry);
recItemLedgerEntry.”Entry No.” := i;
recItemLedgerEntry.”Item No.” := FORMAT(intItemNo);
recItemLedgerEntry.”Location Code” := FORMAT(intLocationCode);
recItemLedgerEntry.”Posting Date” := dat;
recItemLedgerEntry.”All Other Fields” := ’some random value);
recItemLedgerEntry.INSERT(FALSE);
END;
COMMIT;

timStopTime := TIME;
intNrOfSeconds := (timStopTime - timStartTime) * 1000;
decRecordsPerSecond :=
intRecordsInserted / intNrOfSeconds;

// and “decRecordsPerSecond” was about 10 times higher in 5.0SP1 confronted with 5.0.

ItemBudgetEntry.DELETEALL;
COMMIT;
Item.FINDFIRST;
xDT := CURRENTDATETIME;
FOR i := 100000 DOWNTO 1 DO BEGIN
ItemBudgetEntry.”Entry No.” := i;
// ok := ItemBudgetEntry.INSERT; // test with this line means no use of bulk inserts
ItemBudgetEntry.INSERT; // test with this line means use of bulk inserts (NAV 5.0 (SP1) or higher, only!)
END;
ItemBudgetEntry.”Entry No.” := 0;
ok := ItemBudgetEntry.INSERT;
MESSAGE(’%1′,CURRENTDATETIME - xDT);

(instead of ItemBudgetEntry one can use an arbitrary Ledger Entry table)
I ran this code 5 times, either uncommenting the first line or the second.
With NAV5.0 I got the same result in each case, namely 19 sec (+/- 1 sec) - this is not too surprising.
Then I ran the same code on a NAV 5.0 (SP1) SQL Client and the results are as follows:
using bulk inserts: 20 sec (+/- 2 sec)
not using bulk inserts: 27 sec (+/- 1 sec)
These results are completely incomprehensible to me, and need to be checked again and again by as many testers as possible….

http://www.goiwx.com/servicesDynamicshosting.html

Thanks Kriki!

Questions? Shoot our SE an email: rjburgess@goiwx.com

ItemBudgetEntry.DELETEALL;
Item.FINDFIRST;
xDT := CURRENTDATETIME;
FOR i := 100000 DOWNTO 1 DO BEGIN
ItemBudgetEntry.\”Entry No.\” := i;
ItemBudgetEntry.INSERT;
Item.FIND;
END;
MESSAGE(\’%1\’,CURRENTDATETIME - xDT);

The messaged time spent is nearly the same with or without the Item.FIND. This is not too surprising, because according to the explanation of the bulk inserts method, it collects merely subsequent INSERTs to perform them as late as possible, but the underlying SQL commands should be identical.

actually a simpler way is just to delete the log file. Basically you just detach the database from SQL, delete the log file then reattach. When you reattach a small clean log file is created that you can easily manipulate and clean up.

Well, this has been a weird convention for me. I have been doing a lot and nothing at the same time….

best regards,
Paul

Gerdien was right: sure I mentioned your blog in my closing speech! Sorry that I didn’t find the time to put a link on a sheet in my powerpoint, but I’m even more sorry that you missed it! Be sure that I will wait till you’re part of the audience before I’ll mention you at Directions 2010! On behalf of the Directions EMEA team: thanks for all the blogging you did on Directions EMEA, we really need all publicity we can get to make Directions EMEA 2010 an even bigger succes! Keep up the good work!!

Paul Jonker

Next time, bring a video camera with you, and make some movies

Joannah

http://2gbmemory.net

Is there any document available for a Mic. partner to review the cost and profit? Are potential customers asking for partners or is saasplaza looking for partners who transfer there current customers to saas?

Microsoft Dynamics NAV blogosphere wasn%u2019t particularly active in February. Trust me, I don%u2019t blame anyone…

best solution is :
- Keep the standard (in your case Italian) OS in place, and remove everything you don’t need. And run defrag on the drive.
- Get the program GPARTED. Shrink the size of the OS partition to leave only about 1 gig or so free.
- Craete a new partition in the free space.
- Copy the OS install CD onto this new partition.
- Boot the old OS, and then run the install program off the other drive.
- Use Dual boot to select the OS you need.

PS as to the reasons for this. There are two prime reasons that they don’t want you reinstalling a different OS.
1/ Support. They don’t want people calling up to ask support for a different OS to what they have tested. (this is the BS reason that they will tell you).
2/ Spy ware/Games/Viruses etc.
Call them what you will, but virtually all Personal Computers these days come pre-installed with suites of virus and spy ware software.
These provide additional revenue streams to the hardware Vendor. So you have a 30 days trial virus installed, and get a warning that your nice new pc will self destruct in 30 days if you don’t subscribe.

The vendors don’t want you having a clean install, since then there is a lower chance of a sale.

HTH

John

My company is bringing NAV hosting to the market. We also have deployed NAV in a virtualised environment at customer sites.

Please take a look at the link provided:

http://www.ada.co.uk/ec08/navision/

If you would like to find out more information please get in contact.

BR
James

The "Key" virtual table contains information about the keys that are defined in each table…

-Attachments: We can attach files????? Yes you can! In the forum postings only images are allowed. In the PM’s, you can also attach other file-types.

I think there was a post long ago on mibso about how to do this.

A Saga is normally a story of epic proportions. So the story of Jonah and the whale from the bible is usually called the Saga of Jonah and the whale.

It was an Issue back in 3.1
just curious if you know that for each newer version if you are able to get more and more cache??

What I do is normally start at about 800, then increase in increments of about 10meg. Generally if you try high and start going lower then you don’t get as high as if you start low and slowly increment.

It is weird as hell though isn’t it. I mean it should just accept 1g no problems.

By the way I don’t normally leave the cache at 950 because I have had cases where the client for some reason had to reset the server, and it would not start. In one case I then had to take the cache below 500 to get it to start, and eventually we reinstalled and went for 850.

850 does seem to be the magic number that nearly always starts, and is reliable once started.

Always use RAID-1. NEver ever anything else for the Natvie db.

If You wan’t to learn more about this you can search the forums on www.dynamicsuser.net

Best regards

Lars Westman

Jörg (just copied your name from your comment ),
It was also for me a pleasure to meet you after so many years online.

I had a great time presenting it.

Best regards,
Jörg

In case something goes seriously wrong with your system, you can have it back in no time.