|
The point of having Direct Cost Applied is because inventory cost cannot be treated as expense (loss) until the goods are actually sold.
When you post a purchase of goods, you debit the purchases accounts (increasing your expenses / loss), which you shouldn't - because there is no loss if you have the goods, and until you sell the goods. That's why you credit the Direct Cost Applied account to neutralize the expenses. Basically, from Income Statement perspective, there is no expense here.
When you sell goods, then you debit the Cost of Goods Sold account, which increases your expenses.
(the description above is simplified, and it doesn't include what happens at balance sheet side for payables, receivables and inventory of either of transactions)
If both sales and purchases happen in the same month, then Direct Cost Applied and COGS get balanced, and that's expected (because then your inventory has no effect on your profit / loss).
However, if the goods are not sold in the period when they are purchased, then you must not show them in your Income Statement - and if you had excluded the Direct Cost Applied account from it, then only purchases would show there, meaning that the expense has actually occurred, while it hadn't.
I would say that you need to talk to your accountant once again, and make sure that both COGS and Direct Cost Applied are configured as Income Statement accounts, and whatever happens in NAV is completely correct, as far as IAS/IFRS rules go.
_________________ (Co-)author of "Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009" http://navigateintosuccess.com/
|